Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pbr's avatar

Is this series really that popular? Are we looking just to see pretty fashions, the lives of these women who have more disposable income, or is it a critique of a place, time, and human interactions and its unrealistic view? I really don’t understand why someone would dress is a tutu at age 50+. What I would like to see, if it’s just a fashion show, is innovative fashions older women can wear without looking like they are trying to be young. Mixing old with new.

As we get older our bodies change, our individual style morphs into what we are noticed for, fun jewelry, a scarf, comfortable jeans, loafers! Right now there seems to be a lack of reading the room, understanding the economics of every day people, and alternative voices. I look at the AA community and see far more interesting clothes, the mashing together of patterns, the ability to have a moment when you gasp at the beauty and thought they have thrown together. Real kicker it is both men and women secure in who they are and a voice of confidence that I don’t see elsewhere in fashion.

Such a weird time in so many respects.

Lauren's avatar

I'll have to read the rest of the comments/recap in a sec, but one thing that bugged me about the Mary storyline, apart from Carrie and Miranda being huge snobs (they always were) was that Rosie's character had no edge. I kept waiting for the catch: Mary was lying about being a virgin like in The Wedding Crashers, she was actually a huge beeyotch, but...nope. So C&M spent the whole episode making fun of a perfectly lovely woman who just wanted to experience New York for the first time.

That's an issue with this show I've noticed: there's no serration, no real stakes. The writing refuses to give real problems to these absurdly rich women.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?